Of course, this assumes that the benefit of the charity is actually a main point of focus. Finding and eliminating inefficiencies in the budgeting would be beneficial to the charity as it frees funds for other fundraising events or actual charitable projects. It seems to me, then, that it would be in the best interest for the charity, and the public, to understand how these funds, especially the staff budget, are actually being used to improve the event itself and return for PCF. Especially in these circumstances, it seems that the money spent on running charity events for them should be scrutinized for efficiency, because the difference could very well be the budget for another full research grant or awareness campaign for them. (Whether or not that is actually true is not my point here.) Making a medium sized donation to PCF as an individual, at least to me, felt like it could actually have an impact, because according to their agenda, it actually would. One of the primary selling points of PCF as a charity to support at AGDQ, at least to me, has been that they promise and support projects that have a relatively strong impact at a fairly low budget for the field. While AGDQ, as it stands with this budget, is still a good ROI for them I can't help but feel that the deal is rather lopsided. However, the compensation should be adequate and not only measured from a purely financial, but also moral point of view. I'm one of the first to say that charity work should be compensated for fairly if desired, and I've not had any issues with the principle direction of the arrangements with PCF from the start. Frankly, I (and many others), have trouble seeing 6700 hours of quality work being invested into AGDQ. With that much time compensated, surely one of the 19 people should be able to find an hour or two to disclose how this time budget is actually assigned and consumed. That's just over two months of full time work by a staff of 19. Is there any chance we can get a more detailed breakdown of this figure? At $25/h this comes out to just shy of 6700 man hours of staff time paid for by PCF. We've been working on this event for a while now! Thread title: It's that time of year, we've got most of our ducks in a row now and can go over what we're looking at for the upcoming AGDQ. We cannot be specific about particular sponsorship, staff or other contractual agreements. Note that most line items are estimates, and are almost always lower, especially charity payout. Twitch Subscription money during non-marathon months as well as ad revenue goes to GDQ and covers expenses (servers, lawyer, etc).Īttendee revenue is used as a buffer for expenses, damages, cancellations (hotel contracts are very expensive to break), as well as attendee entertainment, equipment, taxes, accountant, and monthly expenses if any. Subscriber revenue during the month(s) of the event goes to the charity (January, for AGDQ). GDQ does receive sponsorship prizes for giveaways, or borrowing equipment (Gamespot’s camera arrangement for AGDQ2014 for instance) for the stream. We do not receive kickbacks from sponsorship arrangements. Sponsorship funds are sent directly to the charity from the sponsor, without our involvement. World9/PowerUp Audio Hotel and travel: ~$3000 Hilton Conference Space: $39,000 (Includes internet expenses)Įntertainment Budget (soon-to-be-announced/pinball/etc): $10,000Įntertainment includes third-party soon-to-be-announced staff and their hotel/travel, etc. Movers/truck rental/World9 equipment haul from Wisconsin: $9,000 max Prize Funding Budget: $1000 (rarely used) Staff budget includes flights/travel, does not pay for hotel or badges. Rather than get super wordy, going to keep it short and simple:Īnything not used in the PCF budget is money that PCF keeps. It's that time of year, we've got most of our ducks in a row now and can go over what we're looking at for the upcoming AGDQ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |